Puyallup City Council is considering a ban on people over the age of 12 riding a bike on a sidewalk, city-owned parking lot or alley in the city’s downtown in part due to “a recent increase in criminal activity by persons riding bicycles on the sidewalks located in the CBD-Core,” according to a whereas clause in the ordinance proposal by Councilmember Jim Kastama (PDF).
Though bill sponsors said they were concerned about pedestrian safety during an October 2 meeting (video), targeting people suspected of drug dealing seemed to be at least part of the desire for the proposed ban.
“My understanding was that our law enforcement officials are asking for this because we’ve got people riding around, dealing heroin,” said Councilmember Cynthia Jacobsen during the meeting. “That’s kind of a tough thing to say from the dais, but that was my understanding.”
Puyallup Police Chief Scott Engle said he does support a sidewalk biking ban, but for pedestrian safety.
But this proposal follows a dramatic Council action to use zoning laws to severely limit the locations of facilities that serve people experiencing homelessness in Puyallup. The ordinance effectively make it illegal to open a facility anywhere outside a small industrial area in the northeast corner of town, the News Tribune reported. Earlier this year, Councilmember Kastama also led a successful effort to get rid of public toilets because they were used by people experiencing homelessness.
Kastama’s sidewalk biking ban proposal lists “criminal activity” as one of the reasons, and during the meeting he described a rather specific demographic as the target of his ordinance.
“For some strange reason, there are a lot of adult men on BMX bikes but nevertheless they are wreaking somewhat havoc in the pedestrian areas,” he said. Councilmember Robin Farris questioned Kastama’s motivation behind the proposal during the meeting.
“The comment about adult men on BMXes can lead people to think that this may be motivated by something other than public safety,” she said.
Under Washington State law, sidewalk biking is allowed, but people biking are required to yield to people walking. State law does allow municipalities to ban sidewalk biking in downtown areas, but this is the first time I am aware of a sidewalk biking ban being used to explicitly target a certain subset of people. And it’s definitely the first time I’ve heard of anyone seeing a sidewalk biking ban as a way to stop drug dealing.
Councilmember Jacobsen asked Police Chief Engle to clarify his position during the October 2 meeting.
“Is part of this because of the drug trade and all the frankenbicycles and all the driving around and doing stuff with drugs?” she asked.
“There are certainly people we have arrested that have been on bicycles who have been in possession of narcotics,” said Engle. But that’s not why he supports the law, he said. “I support this from a public safety perspective.”
But especially with such a specific demographic of people clearly targeted by the ordinance author, this law seems to open the door to unequal enforcement. All over the country, from Chicago to Tampa, police regularly enforce bicycle laws more heavily on people of color. Especially for low-income people, an unpaid ticket can turn into a court summons and then a warrant for arrest. And many instances of police use-of-force begin with very low-level contacts like traffic stops that then escalate.
“I don’t see this as a reach out of the police department for every single person who is riding downtown,” said Engle during the meeting. “You hire police officers to make good decisions, and I expect our officers to use discretion and make good decisions.”
Mayor John Palmer said downtown Puyallup streets probably do not feel safe for many people “because there are no bike lanes in the downtown core.” He said the city will look into other options for addressing the issue, like maybe a sidewalk speed limit.
“I don’t want to do anything to infringe bike riding in Puyallup,” he said. He mentioned the need for bike connections to Sound Transit service and the Foothills Trail, and pointed to the Active Transportation Plan the city adopted last year that includes bike lanes. “I hope we can start implementing that plan.”
But the plan calls for few bike routes in the downtown core. And until Puyallup’s downtown streets have bike lanes, many people will choose to bike on the sidewalk because they feel safer there. It is nearly always faster to bike in the street, so the small percentage of people who feel comfortable in mixed traffic are likely already doing so. Making sidewalk biking illegal without providing a safer option forces people to either break the new law or stop biking entirely.
The Council is focused on the budget for the next couple weeks, but the sidewalk biking ordinance could come back up next month. Mayor Palmer, Councilmember Robin Farris and Puyallup Police Public Information Officer Ryan Portmann said the proposal as written is too broad. For example, it would extend far beyond just sidewalks, including alleys and city-owned parking lots. It’s not clear whether the city even has the legal authority to ban biking in those places, since bikes are vehicles under state law and can go anywhere vehicles are allowed other than designated limited access freeways. But the extent of the ban area is also rather broad, extending far beyond the handful of downtown blocks with heavy pedestrian activity.
“I would literally have to walk my bicycle from my house to City Hall,” said Councilmember Farris.
Mayor Palmer said the next step is for the City Manager to bring the Council some other options for the ordinance, likely in November or December. Though the Council could propose and adopt an ordinance all in one meeting, it is rare for them to do so.
People who want to comment on the ordinance can email the whole Council at [email protected]. People can also provide public comment before the Council meetings, though the date for discussing this proposal is to be determined.
Comments
8 responses to “Puyallup considers sidewalk biking ban ‘because we’ve got people riding around, dealing heroin’”
I wonder what will happen when they figure out that a vast majority of drugs in Puyallup are transported by car?
Could be the first car-free downtown in Washington!
Don – you are such a dreamer! I love it.
[…] may ban sidewalk biking because of… […]
I don’t have a problem with banning adults on bicycles from sidewalks. They should be using the street for the safety of pedestrians. As long as the law is enforced fairly it shouldn’t be a problem. At other times in my life I’ve commuted by bike. Riding on the sidewalk would have slowed me down even if I thought it was okay. For kids it’s fine as long as they understand they need to keep the speed down and yield to pedestrians.
Are you high Michael Brown? Oh, maybe you ride a bike, so maybe you are…right/ Or….maybe you are black or brown and you ride a bike…so now..the cops can (selectively) harass you since now they can stop and search you for the mere fact you are present on a side path on a bike.
Think about that for a moment.
How do the cops tell you are over 12? How do they prove you are over 12? No matter…just one more reason for the cops to kill a black and brown boy. Hey, they had it coming..right? They were riding their super dangerous bikes on the sidepath near the white folk!
There is a reason that the entire state of Georgia (you know, the bastion of civil rights) has a STATEWIDE BAN on riding bikes on anywhere but in the path of cars. (which Mr. Michael Brown is so in favor of). That is, if you LOOK over the age of 12. You see, Georgia has perfected the art of selective harassment and the sidepath law is just one arrow in their quiver…
In the spirit of Trump…let’s get our bans on! (Banjos in the background)
If you need to be on the sidewalk, just get off the bike and walk it. Ability to do that is one of a bike’s chief advantages over a car…isn’t it?
Mark Dublin
Uh, no. There are plenty of places where the road is unsafe, the side path is completely clear and I am riding.