Imagine a street in your neighborhood that is difficult to cross on foot, scary to bike on and/or where buses are constantly getting stuck in car traffic. I know, this was not a difficult imagination exercise. Streets like this are everywhere in Washington State. But when people try to get their city, county or—worst of all—state to make changes to the street that would improve safety and transit reliability, they are often met with resistance from someone within the transportation agency who says such changes are not possible because they would reduce the “level of service” on the street. And for much of the past century, reducing level of service was widely seen as the last thing a traffic engineer or city planner should ever do.
Typical American measurements of level of service only measure car delays, making it a horrible rubric for designing a safe, comfortable and sustainable public street or place. Yet until now, state law required communities to plan around this de facto “car level of service” goal regardless of how it affects people walking, biking or taking transit. Car level of service also has little regard for concerns like fostering strong business districts or safe streets near parks and schools.
Governor Jay Inslee signed HB 1181, a major overhaul of the state’s Growth Management Act. Among other changes, it replaces mentions of “level of service” with “multimodal level of service.” It also completely rewrites the transportation section to include active transportation and transit in sections that previously only pertained to cars. As someone who has spent a lot of time parsing legislative markup texts, seeing references to “traffic” crossed out and replaced with “multimodal transportation demand and needs” is very satisfying.
Disability Rights Washington called it “an important piece of legislation to ensure that we are planning for communities that will be safe and accessible for everyone” in a press release following the signing. The organization also praised the way the bill increases transit accessibility requirements and requires planning for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. More details from the Disability Right Washington press release:
The first provision is the requirement that cities and counties use a multimodal level of service to assess the efficiency and safety of their transportation systems. As such, jurisdictions will have to develop transportation plans that address multimodal transportation demand and needs to balance system safety and convenience and accommodate all users of transportation systems to safely, reliably, and efficiently provide access and mobility to all. Priority must be given to the inclusion of transportation facilities and services that provide the greatest multimodal safety benefit to each category of roadway users for the context and speed of the facility.
The second element of this bill that addresses transit accessibility is the requirement that state and local government, public entities, and public agencies perform self-evaluations of their current transportation facilities, relative to accessibility requirements of the American Disability Act (ADA). Agencies must then develop and execute access transition plans to address any deficiencies to ensure all transportation facilities are accessible by ADA regulations.
Comments
2 responses to “Under new law, Washington communities must plan around ‘multimodal level of service’”
did the new law describe how these modal flows would be measured? Did it fund the cost of measuring the flow? How about safety metrics? What is safe enough? A very important question because with movement comes risk so to think that we can eliminate risk is false but even if zero isn’t the target, we need to define what the target metric is and how to measure it and how to fund the measuring efforts.
When it comes to forested urban-fringe trails, clearing and widening just to provide ADA accessibility for motorized wheelchair users is not an “improvement” but a further degradation, clearing and paving over of the few remaining natural recreation areas left in and around our cities. Not ALL trails need to be altered to accommodate the relatively small alter-abled portion of our community!