— Advertisement —

Everyone in the Puget Sound region should fill out this road safety plan survey

Map with circles denoting high crash intersections and hot spots across the region. The majority of them are state routes.
This map of high crash locations across the region point to state routes as an outsized part of the problem. From the PSRC’s State of Safety in the Region report (PDF).

As with other places across the nation, traffic deaths and injuries are rising at a desperate rate. Across the Puget Sound Region, annual traffic deaths have nearly doubled since 2010. We have almost reached one per day.

If you live in King, Kitsap, Pierce or Snohomish Counties, take this survey about the Puget Sound Regional Council’s Safety Action Plan. The plan’s goal is to “establish and foster a regional culture of safety with a focus on protecting vulnerable roadway users and communities,” according to the online engagement hub. The plan would take a safe system approach to traffic management, helping to guide high-level funding, such as Federal grants, while also helping local communities develop safety action plans for their local investments.

Yes, it’s another plan. But Cascade Bicycle Club’s Vicky Clarke put it well in an email urging folks to complete the survey:


— Advertisement —

I’ll be real; I’m sick of plans. I want action. That said, this plan is different by seeking to understand resident’s openness to particular street safety improvements, like bike lanes, sidewalks, crosswalks, and safer vehicle speed limits. 

This is your chance to say “yes please” to things that will make it safer to get around. Please spend 5 minutes completing it, because one thing’s for sure: without caring neighbors like you and me asking for change, the status quo on our streets will remain. 

The PSRC also recently released a 50-page State of Safety in the Region report (PDF) with a lot of information about traffic safety trends across the region. Stay tuned for a follow-up post about this report, because there is a lot to unpack. But the short of it is that this is a problem the state and the entire region need to take on together because it is much bigger than any one place. We need a regional approach. The report predictably did not find a clear single cause of the increase, but it led them to the following “key findings.”

  1. Deaths on the region’s roadways have nearly doubled in the last decade. This is the wrong direction, and unacceptable.
  2. Bicyclists and pedestrians represent nearly half of the increase in deaths, with pedestrians representing the vast majority.
  3. Crashes are happening everywhere – in all parts of the region, but there are as many deaths in rural areas as in the biggest cities.
  4. Communities with lower income residents have 37% higher rates of serious injuries and deaths than higher income areas. Communities with majority people of color have 32% higher rates of serious injuries and deaths than the region as a whole.
  5. Deaths and serious injuries are 70% higher in areas with a majority of both people of color and lower incomes compared to the regional average.
  6. Native American and Alaskan Native community members are seven times more likely to die in crashes than white residents.
  7. Mapping crashes shows the most frequent fatalities and serious injuries occur on major arterials with higher posted speeds.
  8. The vast majority of crashes involve cars and light trucks. However, those involving motorcyclists have a one in four risk of death or serious injury, five times that of cars or trucks.
  9. In crashes involving light trucks and SUVs, pedestrian and bicyclist deaths are 43% higher than crashes involving passenger cars.
  10. The most frequent contributing factors resulting in deaths and serious injuries involve speeding, impairment, distraction, and failures to yield. Crashes may include multiple factors.

Related posts:

Comments

7 responses to “Everyone in the Puget Sound region should fill out this road safety plan survey”

  1. Peri Hartman

    I did it. Be sure to browse the preceding pages before starting the survey. See tabs at top.

  2. Anne

    From their page:
    nr 9 in top 10 key findings: “In crashes involving light trucks and SUVs, pedestrian and bicyclist deaths are 43% higher than crashes involving passenger cars.”

    That is just astounding. So if we starting tomorrow everyone would start driving normal cars instead of those big cars we could save so many lives.

    1. Dave

      That’s literally not how it works.

      1. Al Dimond

        IDK how else to read the finding.

  3. Don Brubeck

    Done.
    I added these comments under “are there other factors contributing…”:
    – Auto-centric culture.
    – Impatience.
    – Lack of compassion for others.
    – Failure to perceive pedestrians and bicycle riders on the street.

    and these comments under “are there strategies you would suggest that are not on this list…”
    – Regular re-testing for driver licenses.
    – Truck side guards on all heavy trucks.
    – Regulation of vehicle design to reduce pedestrian impacts.
    – No right-on-red at signalized intersections.
    – Changing 4-lane arterials to 3-lane.

    1. NickS

      I agree with all of these. I added:

      * Traffic enforcement. People are doing absurd things behind the wheel because they know that the odds of getting pulled over and ticketed or arrested are vanishingly small. SPD just doesn’t do traffic enforcement anymore. I’ve seen it all over the last several years. 60 in a 25? Check. Driving straight through two four way stops in a row? Check. Doing that while leaning on your horn and driving around other stopped drivers, on the wrong side of the road? Check. Pulling up to red lights in the middle of the day, glancing around for cops, and driving right through the light? Check. Veering around speed cushions and driving in an adjoining bike lane, so you don’t have to slow? At least 50% of drivers.

      * Impounding vehicles of repeat offenders. Of course, this doesn’t work without traffic enforcement, so it’s probably a non-starter.

      * Graduated licenses for oversized vehicles. A new driver or repeat offender? You’ll be limited to vehicles under a certain weight.

      * Higher registration fees for oversized / overweight vehicles. They add risk for everyone else, and they cause greater wear and tear on the roads. Not only do we reduce risk, we increase fleet MPG. Win-win.

      Do I think any of the above will actually happen? Nope. Just another survey to tell us what we already know.

  4. Al Dimond

    It’s a bit disappointing for an agency as high-level as PSRC to jump straight into road behavior and even road design when asking questions about danger on streets. It would be one thing if this was a DOT study. But PSRC is a wider and more general body that addresses broader policy concerns.

    Our growth in traffic danger is concentrated among poor people walking along and across very busy roads. To me some obvious culprits are:

    – Growth in suburban poverty — more people living and working in car-oriented places, places designed for car speeds over pedestrian safety, that can’t afford to drive.
    – Lack of housing in safer places — city-to-city, neighborhood-to-neighborhood, and block-to-block, the safest places to live have the highest prices and worst supply constraints, which pushes people that most need safe non-driving options to more dangerous places.
    – Failure to plan communities and the region for anything but absolute car-dependence

    None of that is something we can fix tomorrow but all of it is in PSRC’s wheelhouse.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


— Advertisement —

Join the Seattle Bike Blog Supporters

As a supporter, you help power independent bike news in the Seattle area. Please consider supporting the site financially starting at $5 per month:

Latest stories

— Advertisements —

Latest on Mastodon

Loading Mastodon feed…