— Advertisement —

Tell King County Parks trails should be open 24 hours

Night photo of a group of people biking on a trail.
These people should be biking on busy street instead, according to parks rules.

It’s midnight, and you’re biking home from a night out. Should you ride on the separated biking and walking path or along the side of the nearby state highway? If you think the answer is obvious, then congratulations! You’re a lawbreaker.

King County Trails are only open from dawn until dusk. We can debate whether any park should close at dusk, but regional trails are important transportation infrastructure. It makes no more sense to close a trail at night than it does a road or highway. People travel at all hours, so our safest biking and walking routes need to be open at all hours.

The good news is that King County is currently considering changes to the time of day restrictions on trails, and they are collecting feedback through an online survey. Go fill it out, and tell them that trails should be open 24 hours.


— Advertisement —

The reality is that this is not a real rule, and everybody knows it. I have never heard of anyone getting in trouble solely for biking on a King County trail after dusk. But that’s also a problem. Having a rule on the books that essentially everybody ignores gives law enforcement wide discretion about who they stop. Other similar laws, such as King County’s old bicycle helmet law, have been misused to profile people based on race or homelessness status. This is a big reason why the King County Board of Health repealed the helmet law in 2022.

The King County Council in June tasked the Parks Department with conducting a “feasibility assessment” for extending trail hours and reporting back with the results by February. The current survey will surely be part of that assessment. The Council also gave the Parks Director the power to extend trail hours on a trail-by-trail basis without the need for further Council action. They also allowed Parks to keep trails open even if they pass through parks that are otherwise closed. So everything is set up for Parks to take action and change these trail rules.

It should be 100% legal to bike or walk on the safest route regardless of the time of day. Period. There is no wiggle room here.

Though King County Parks are not in control of trails within the Seattle city limits, Seattle isn’t off the hook here, either. According to the Seattle Parks website, Seattle’s official open hours for the Burke-Gilman Trail are the same as the rest of the city’s parks (SMC 18.12.245): 4 a.m. to 11:30 p.m. I am not sure if these hours pertain to sections of the trail under the jurisdiction of SDOT or the University of Washington, however. Seattle’s hours are slightly more lenient than King County Parks, but they are not good enough. The Seattle code setting trail hours includes exemptions for park boulevards, which seems to acknowledge that transportation facilities should not close at night. So why close trails then?

We need our whole region to agree together that trail are open 24 hours regardless of which agency is in charge or which section. It’s absurd that someone might be biking along a trail and suddenly become a scofflaw because they crossed a city limit line after 11:30 p.m.

Seattle’s rules, which include many hours of darkness, make absolutely no sense. If a trail is safe to use at 4 a.m., then it is just as safe at 3 a.m. King County might be able to claim that their trails are not designed to be safe for use in the dark, and so “closing” them might shield them from liability if someone were to, for example, crash on an unmaintained bump in the trail surface that was difficult to see at night. But people are already using them at night, so the county should already be maintaining them to be safe after the sun goes down. Simply keeping a rule on the books that few people even know about is not a good solution.



About the author:


Related posts:

Comments

7 responses to “Tell King County Parks trails should be open 24 hours”

  1. R

    There was a similar issue with the segment of the Elliot Bay Trail that passes through Portland of Seattle managed property in Interbay when I lived in Magnolia which I presume hasn’t changed since I moved away. I never heard of any enforcement and didn’t observe the posted hours because I wasn’t interested in peddling up 15th.

  2. Dave

    Idk. The idea of people being allowed to hang around along an isolated trail in the middle of the night definitely does not make me feel safe about biking or walking there, and I’m not so sure it should be allowed. The threat of selective enforcement might actually have the benefit of deterring someone from spending time along the trail at night if they’re up to no good.

    1. Al Dimond

      I have to register strong disagreement here. One of the best principles of our democracy is equal protection under law. It’s often more of an aspiration than a real thing — all too often it’s more accurate to say that some people are protected by the law and other people are subjected to it. Modern curfews (where most people are left alone and specific people are targeted without any “probable cause” or even “reasonable suspicion”) are some of the purest examples of this, and the notion that we should be selectively protected by nighttime closures while violating them is curfew logic.

      I don’t think it actually works for us, either. I use trails during nighttime closures fairly often. I’ve never seen a patrol happen. I see people hang out and set up camps along trails just as they do along public streets and sidewalks that are open all day. Sometimes the city kicks ’em out, but no more often than along similar streets and sidewalks.

      As cyclists we’re sometimes on the butt-end of the protected-by/subjected-to dichotomy. Not as much as people that are racialized or visibly poor, of course! But it’s part of the experience of biking for transportation and it shapes my thinking on this. Although we nominally have the right to ride on most roads, everyone, from the driver right behind us up through the mayor, wants us out of the way of roads that are “for cars”, whether we have good alternatives or not. So part of my advocacy is that I don’t want this to be the way on the bike path.

  3. Shane

    Survey is not open

  4. AW

    Just keeping the trails open at night isn’t good enough. Money and effort should be spent to make them safer at night by including reflectors on the side of the roads and new lighting. WSDOT did a good job with the 520 trail and I don’t expect that level but there is much that could be done.

    1. Al Dimond

      Yeah, I couldn’t agree more. But I think lifting the closures has to be the first step. As it is the path of least resistance for them is to keep things the way they are. If we can make a case for changing this simple policy (as opposed to making a case for a whole suite of infrastructure improvement projects over years), suddenly they have to acknowledge that nighttime transportation cyclists are among the users of the trails, and any one of us that suffers a crash where poor visibility was a factor (as I did a few years ago) could sue them. Under that threat improvements seem… more possible.

  5. Leig

    Males-on-Bikes :

    Older males seem now to shift to bike-travel.

    Walkers & runners , who 40-yrs ago enjoyed those various FOOT PATHs, are now hounded by these racing bike-Bozos.

    Recently, even motorized-bikes have joined the bike-Bozos, chasing us pedestrians from OUR former foot-paths: official “trails” are now bicycle RACEWAYs — racing against their onboard stopwatches.

    Yesterday the SIDEWALK wasn’t safe — now the younger crowd must use electric-bikes on OUR SIDEWALKS.

    Pedestrians deserve the right to use our former-pathways (now “trails”).

    I’m a mid-70s-yr-old distance runner — but the official “trails” are NOT SAFE with bike-Bozos using our former foot-paths as their RACEWAY.

    [These older bike-Bozos are not in condition to RUN the “trails”, so they now use a bike. ]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


— Advertisement —

Join the Seattle Bike Blog Supporters

As a supporter, you help power independent bike news in the Seattle area. Please consider supporting the site financially starting at $5 per month:

Latest stories

— Advertisements —

Latest on Mastodon

Loading Mastodon feed…