Washington Transportation Secretary Roger Millar argued against further highway expansion during his State of Transportation presentation to the House Transportation Committee this week. Instead, he argued for “a resilient response” to the state’s major challenges, including climate change, inequitable traffic impacts and increasing traffic injuries and deaths.
“We are a Target Zero state, and we’re going the wrong way,” said Millar. “The data shows our system isn’t safe. It kills people, and we need to invest to stop that.” WSDOT estimates that the monetary cost of collisions, injuries and deaths is about $14 billion per year. Of course, a life is more important than money.
Meanwhile, the state is investing less than half of what it should be investing to maintain existing infrastructure. The state has been building a lot of new and expanded infrastructure, which only makes it more difficult to maintain the infrastructure the state already has. As that new infrastructure comes due for maintenance, the backlog gets that much worse. At this point, the state would need to spend about a billion dollars more per year than it is currently spending just to tread water.
One part of the solution is to stop trying to expand highways to solve congestion. WSDOT gave a rough estimate that it would cost upwards of $115 billion over ten years to add enough lanes to freeways to allow people to drive the speed limit at all times. That would require as much as $2.50 per gallon in additional gas taxes. This rough estimate does not even include all the costs associated with increasing local and connector roads to meet the induced demand from the newly-widened freeways.
“Addressing congestion through adding lanes to the Interstate system is not financially feasible, it’s not economically feasible, it’s not environmentally feasible. It’s just not going to happen,” said Millar. “We need to think about doing things differently.” He even said that the state’s path of continually expanding freeways to solve congestion has “come to a dead end.”
Another part of the solution is to find ways to better use the infrastructure we have and invest in alternatives to driving. Providing affordable housing options close to jobs is “the single best thing” the legislature could do to help meet this goal, he said. When people live close to jobs and their other destinations, they can more easily walk and bike to get what they need.
“Getting more out of the system we already have through managing the system and managing demand for the system,” said Millar. “The single best thing that this body, the legislature, could do in addressing our transportation demand needs would be to address the need for affordable housing near where people work. Link transportation and land use. Make the choices about affordable housing linked to the choices about affordable transportation. Make it easy and safe to take short trips by walking and biking.”
The state’s brand new Active Transportation Plan identified $5 billion in needs, including things like sidewalks, paths and bike facilities across the state. Transit needs and opportunities, which pair well with these active transportation investments, are also extensive.
Hopefully legislators listened to Secretary Millar’s assessment of the state’s needs with an open mind. They are working to build a major funding package during this short session, and the path to changing WSDOT’s work starts with legislators, not the Secretary. WSDOT is tasked with building the projects that the legislature earmarks whether those projects are good or not. If legislators stick to the same old pet project earmarking that has plagued previous transportation funding packages, then our state will get the same old results: More costly car infrastructure we can’t afford to maintain that further entrenches communities in an endless reliance on unsustainable and unaffordable private car transportation. Or they could do things differently, prioritizing highway spending that maintains safe infrastructure, expanding funding for walking, biking and transit so people don’t need to drive, and investing in communities harmed by past highway construction.
You can watch the whole State of Transportation presentation on TVW:
Comments
8 responses to “WA Transportation Secretary: Further freeway expansion is ‘a dead end’”
“We have met the enemy, and they is us!”
The problem is America is changing. But there are realities that we are not yet willing to face as a nation.
1. We love the idea of a mobile society. We want the freedom to come and go as we choose. We want the Sunday drive in the country. We want the vacation on the coast or in the mountains.
2. Bicycles are not a reasonable commuter option. Yes, they work for 3-5% of the nation. But not for the rest of us. There are obstacles, like being old, transporting children, hills, weather, distance, time.
3. We have not advanced enough in our collective thinking to be able to give up the personal automobile. Not only that, but we are not ready to have reasonably efficient, sensible vehicles. The Ford F-150 is still the most popular new vehicle in America. Really. How many people really need a pickup truck? On my block, nearly every family has one. And not an F-150. We have the biggest monsters made.
4. The number one whine in America is the price of gasoline. Screw the environment. We are not ready to make individual sacrifices.
5. Parking spaces are one of the greatest urban land use items.
6. Our politicians are no help. Even our governor uses coal to heat his mansion as well as most of the capital buildings in Olympia. Yea. It is the law – coal from Washington mines.
Now we know change is coming. Most office workers want to work from home. We are building and paying for rapid transit. So progress is being made. Just not fast enough. Car share or Uber/Lyft are becoming very popular taking away the need for personal autos.
6. Our politicians are no help. Even our governor uses coal to heat his mansion as well as most of the capital buildings in Olympia. Yea. It is the law – coal from Washington mines.
Do you have a source for this? A quick Google search turned up nothing. I would think this would have been used to attack Inslee, considering one of his biggest campaign issues is climate change.
That ‘coal thing’ is pure bunk. The entire Capitol Campus is connected to the local electricity grid, with diesel generators for emergency back-up. If the Capitol burned coal, you’d see smoke belching out of smokestacks whenever the Legislature is in session… and there are too many enviro lobbyists and activists in Olympia to hide something like that.
Uhh. You have not been down in the steam tunnels. They connect the Gov. Mansion, Capitol Building, Temple of Justice (Supreme Court), Insurance Building, the old Conservatory. The steam boilers are next to the Governor’s Mansion. If you want to see the steam boilers, you have to peak over the fence when the guards are not looking. The steam tunnels have a junction on the SE corner of 12th Ave SW and Cherry Lane SW. It is the square wooden platform (about 18″ high). Stand by it and you can hear the roar of the steam. There is no public access to the steam tunnels.
The is no coal from WA mines…
https://www.dnr.wa.gov/programs-and-services/geology/energy-mining-and-minerals/coal-metallic-and-mineral-resources#coal-in-washington.3
Yep. That industry is mostly dead – thank god. The last major coal extraction was in Centralia, but they get all their coal from Montana now. The electric plant in Centralia is scheduled for closure soon.
Sunday drives into the mountains do no require highway expansion, since the highways are not congested then. What they do require is that the existing highways (and rural roads) be maintained (e.g. that the I-90 bridge not fall apart).
If anything needs to be expanded, the major bike trails in Seattle need to be widened to accommodate the crowds they draw now.