— Advertisement —

Alert: It is once again time to voice overwhelming support for a safer Lake Washington Blvd

Map showing the locations of planned speed hump and crosswalk improvements.
Speed cushions don’t stop anyone from driving, but they do make it a little harder to drive too fast.

Even the dramatically watered-down and insufficient traffic calming improvements planned for Lake Washington Boulevard are now apparently at risk after pushback from “people who enjoy driving as fast as they want along the boulevard,” as Seattle Neighborhood Greenways put it. Neighbors have campaigned for years about the need for safer walking and biking space on the storied lakeside boulevard, one of the only reasonably flat north-south routes in southeast Seattle. Extensive public outreach showed very strong support for ambitious changes, but SDOT and Seattle Parks decided to ignore their own outreach and instead give a baffling amount of authority to a failed and resentment-consumed community task force effort in 2022–23 that was unable to agree on much of anything beyond a short list of low-cost, unoffensive and insufficient traffic calming improvements that finally made it to construction in 2024 and 2025. We’re talking about a handful of crosswalk improvements, some speed humps, and some boulders in places where people keep driving off the road and into the park and lake. The final list falls far short of than the permanent on-street walking and biking path and expanded Bicycle Weekend hours advocates were initially hoping for. Safety opponents won, and now at least some of them are fighting even the scraps that made it through by pressuring the city to cancel the second half of the planned improvements.

You can help by using their handy online form to send letters to city leaders supporting completion of the traffic calming work. You can also join supporters at a community meeting 6:30 p.m. December 12 at the Mount Baker Rowing and Sailing Center (3800 Lake Washington Blvd S) in person or online.

I honestly have no idea why the winners of this joke of a public process would want to reopen debate on this matter, but fine. Let’s do it. Let’s reopen this project debate. If they don’t know how to take a W, then let’s turn it into an L.


— Advertisement —

Every time the city surveys people about the idea of a permanent safe space for walking and biking on Lake Washington Blvd., the result is resounding and enthusiastic support. A 2022 public outreach effort got survey responses from 3,048 people, 73% of whom lived in a Seattle zip code that includes Lake Washington Boulevard. The survey asked respondents to pick up to three of their preferred improvements they you like to see on the boulevard. Respondents overwhelmingly supported adding dedicated space for biking (2,319 or 76%), increasing the number of Bicycle Weekends days (1,754 or 58%), and adding traffic calming like speed humps (1,664 or 55%), the top three of eight options. Even though 31% of respondents said they drive on the boulevard as their main commute route, only 14% chose “do nothing” as one of their three preferred changes to the street, a dismal 5% of total responses to the question. Even when they did in-person intercept surveys at nearby grocery stores and community events, they got similar support for better walking and biking conditions on the boulevard even from people who said they usually drive there. Yet we find ourselves once again having to fill out action alerts and pressure city leaders not to listen to this demonstrably unpopular opinion even after these decisions were already made and work is already underway.

From Jan 2015 to April 2022, there were 101 collisions on this park boulevard, including 36 that injured at least one person and 6 that resulted in serious potentially life-long injuries. This is unacceptable and must change. Speed humps, stop signs and raised crosswalks should help, which is why Rainier Valley Greenways has been supporting the watered-down plans despite their frustrations with the process and result. But even once the traffic calming elements are completed, the work will not be finished. Hopefully the rate of serious crashes will be reduced, but there will still be no dedicated space for people of all ages and abilities to bike on the street.

Lake Washington Boulevard is a park. It falls under the purview of the Department of Recreation and was originally designed by the Olmsted Brothers in the early 1900s as a park boulevard, though the Parks Department has since deferred much of the process to SDOT as the city’s experts on roads and traffic. Lake Washington Boulevard is not and has never been a highway, and fast car travel should not be a priority on this street at all. The goal should be to maintain vehicle access to homes and destinations including parking lots, loading zones and boat launches, but that is where a park’s duty to vehicle access ends. The primary goal needs to be providing safe access to everyone regardless of how they traveled there, and the secondary goal should be fostering an extraordinary park experience along our waterfront.

The issue of how to make Lake Washington Boulevard safe for everyone is not over. I am still angry at the city for the way they handled the task force in 2022, which had no logical reason to be given decision-making power. Ideas that got 73% support from a survey of thousands of neighbors got shut down because on the day of task force voting only 10 people could make it and 5 of them voted no. This is not how public outreach or community task forces are supposed to work. Community task forces are supposed to exist so a subset of community members can discuss an issue in a more in-depth manor. You can gather a lot of qualitative feedback, and the task force members can take what they learn back to their larger communities, etc. They are not supposed to be used as democratic decision-making bodies because they were not selected by a population. In a best scenario, task force members could come together and attempt to find some common ground, learn from each other and then maybe some people would change their minds. If you purposefully create a task force so that it contains half people in favor and half against as the city did in this case, you cannot treat a resulting 5–5 split vote as a sign of anything other than that your task force process did not change anyone’s mind. By saying that they would follow whatever the task force recommends, the city essentially told a few safe streets supporters that if they wanted the city to make it safe to ride a bike on this park boulevard, they would need to change the minds of a couple of their outspoken opponents within 10 meetings. They couldn’t, and so the city didn’t. What a ridiculous hoop to force advocates to jump through, and what a mockery of real public outreach.

Let’s get the rest of these speed humps and crosswalks done so we can get to work on the next phase: Safe access for all park users.

More details on the latest action from Seattle Neighborhood Greenways:

Thanks to past community advocacy for a safer and more accessible Lake Washington Boulevard, construction began this November, dramatically reducing dangerous speeding on the boulevard! 🎉🎉🎉 The project is now half completed, with another round of construction expected in spring/summer 2025.

📣But now, completion of the these basic safety improvements for Lake Washington Boulevard are at immediate risk. People who enjoy driving as fast as they want along the boulevard are opposed to basic traffic calming improvements like speed humps are pushing to axe the second phase of traffic calming improvements slated for next summer.

We need your help:

  1. Show up: Community Meeting on Thursday, Dec 12, 6:30 – 8:00 pm. In person at the Mount Baker Rowing and Sailing Center (3800 Lake Washington Blvd S)
  2. Write an email in support of a safer and more accessible Lake Washington Blvd. Use the easy form letter to the right or write your own and send to: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected].
  3. Share this page with 3 neighbors or friends. Word of mouth is the best form of advocacy.

Thank you for your ongoing advocacy!

BACKGROUND:

Lake Washington Boulevard is one of Seattle’s greatest parks. Year round, Seattle families enjoy walking, biking, rolling, swimming, pleasure drives, and more along the 3-mile shoreline between Mt Baker Beach and Seward Park.

As our city has grown, car traffic on Lake Washington Blvd has grown dramatically. More and more drivers use the blvd as a highway, rather than as a scenic drive, bike ride, or stroll it was originally designed for, threatening the safety of other park users.

The proposed renovations are a set of low-cost “short term improvements” that are the result of an extensive three-year process, with vocal and ongoing community support for slowing dangerous speeding and rollover crashes along this peaceful park boulevard. The goal is to reduce vehicle speeds to the posted speed limit, reduce street racing, improve pedestrian access when crossing the blvd to access the waterfront, and improve safety for people walking, rolling, and biking along the blvd.

The curb bulbs, stop signs, and speed humps installed in November are incredibly helpful in slowing dangerous speeding, but not adequate to address safety for the full 3-mile corridor.

We are asking elected officials and city staff to complete the remaining portion of the project without delay or watering down the designs from Mt. Baker Beach to Seward Park.

Related posts:

Comments

18 responses to “Alert: It is once again time to voice overwhelming support for a safer Lake Washington Blvd”

  1. Stephen

    Have the city of Seattle work with Google Maps and Apple Maps to eliminate the shortcuts for commuters on Lake Washington Boulevard. I stopped riding the boulevard during commute times or weekends when I-5 is jammed north and/or south through downtown. I have personally taken Google and Apple shortcuts via Lake Washington Boulevard so I know this is ruining the bicycle riding experience there.

    1. NickS

      For me, the problem is not volume of cars, it’s speed. Word has gotten out that it’s a convenient bypass to I-5, Rainier Ave, MLK Jr Way S, etc. and that you can speed completely without consequences since SPD eliminated their traffic enforcement unit.

      The new speed cushions definitely help, the only problem is that there aren’t enough of them. There should be several more sets between Mt. Baker Beach and the Mt. Baker Rowing & Sailing Center.

      I agree with Tom’s sentiments 100%. I hope that Seattle Neighborhood Greenways can get a lot of people in the room, particularly parents with kids, to show that use of this boulevard extends beyond a few car drivers wanting the status quo of cars first, safety third.

      Please help get the word out to anyone that runs, cycles, and walks in this park, or those who would like a more calm, safe driving experience on the boulevard. I’d say I drive 70%, walk 20%, and bike 10% when using Lake WA Blvd (this does vary by season), and I am wholly in favor of additional safety precautions, built-design that encourages safe driving, separating vulnerable road users from cars via a trail, etc.

    2. Al Dimond

      (Disclaimer: I used to work on Google Maps. It’s been years since then. I’m not saying anything that isn’t known from public actions and statements by various companies in the space.)

      The mapping companies aren’t going to change their data unless the city makes a legal and physical change to the street. If the city designates it as not an arterial, and changes signage and physical layouts accordingly, they’ll eventually update it to reflect that. If the city puts in modal one-way filters they’d have to update data to reflect that change. If the city does something lazy like put up a couple vague caution signs that say NO THRU TRAFFIC, leave everything else the same, then try to complain to (e.g.) Google, Google won’t do anything.

      In the unlikely event one of these companies could be reached for comment their comment would be self-righteous. They believe that it’s generally good to give everyone information about which driving routes are working the best in real-time, and if cities have other priorities it’s their responsibility to do something real about it.

  2. Robert Parfet

    Speed bumps are great, they do slow down most cars but why did SDOT abruptly stop installing them at the Stan Sayres/Genesee Park area? From that point going N to the Mt. Baker Park/beach there aren’t any speed bumps and cars pick really up speed again. The Mt. Baker park/beach in the summer is swarmed by people so it’s shocking that SDOT decided not to add more speed bumps up to that area and beyond. Like who made that decision?

  3. Don Brubeck

    Dear Mayor Harrell, Councilmembers Saka, Morales and Hollingsworth, Directors Spotts and Diaz, and City Staff,

    I am writing to urge you to complete the Lake Washington Boulevard Renovations Project as planned. This already-compromised safety project offers a minimum level of safety for people enjoying the parkway. It will reduce car crash impacts for drivers as well. Please do not delay or reduce the remaining part of the project from Mt. Baker Beach to Seward Park.

    Every time there is a community gathering to honor the memory of another person killed by a driver in a crash, we hear your promises to put safety first. This is a opportunity to put those words into action.

    Please honor your promises to put safety ahead of the desires of some drivers to go as fast as possible along this scenic parkway. The speed humps and other safety improvements help enforce the traffic laws that some drivers are breaking in order to save at most a few seconds of drive time while putting everyone else at risk.

    Sincerely,

  4. Peri Hartman

    I would like to see calming for LW Blvd. Not everyone can bike and some people need to drive for various reasons. So, there will be traffic. But keeping it safe is a priority for me. I’ll try to attend the meeting.

    I keep wondering what Seattle would be like if I5 had been built somewhere further east than Bellevue. Obviously, the East Side would have developed differently. But Seattle probably would be more compact and have a much better transit system, kind of like Vancouver BC. With that, the kind of road-calming projects we have today, I think, would have much higher support. Oh well, just a dream.

  5. Al Dimond

    Ugh, so many speed bumps. We’ve really gotta come up with something better for our bike routes than bumping all the way down the road. If you’re riding for pleasure and scenery bumps rob you of that by making you focus your attention on squaring-up and absorbing bumps every block. If you’re carrying stuff bumps hit extra hard. If you’re going uphill they break your cadence. If you’re going downhill… well… breaking your speed is kinda the point, but it’s pretty clear from the experience of cars riding my tail that it’s breaking my speed a lot more than theirs.

    Do literally anything else for traffic calming. Maybe we can’t get modal one-way filters because of the political shenanigans mentioned in the post, but speed bumps are just giving up… “Oh, well, people suck, better make the road suck for everyone.” There are so many other things we could do! Road-narrowing thingies like the “Stay Healthy Streets” have, which slow down wide vehicles more than narrow ones? Maybe some of the intersections have enough space for a little roundabout? Or those curbs that make you curve around a little, like on the Lake Washington Loop route in Montlake? 4-way stops, which at least have the transportation utility of making turns easier and safer?

    I feel like I have to call for more 4-way stops to dispel the notion that I’m some roadie asshole being annoyed by speed bumps while chasing KOMs… just a normal asshole (but on a bike) doing normal life things (but on a bike) with the normal experience of being annoyed by speed bumps (but on a bike).

    1. Tom Fucoloro

      Speed cushions are definitely not my first choice, but they do work. One part of the problem is that the exact sweet spot for being effective at traffic calming but not being too much of a hindrance to cycling is difficult to hit perfectly. And it relies a lot on the crews doing the work in addition to smart design. There are examples in the city of humps that are too abrupt (25th Ave in the CD for example) while there are others that don’t seem to slow cars enough (15th Ave S on Beacon Hill). In the end, the safety benefits outweigh the negatives, but I agree I’d prefer solutions like, say, narrowing the road by building an on-street trail. Just spitballing here.

      1. Al Dimond

        They work at what? Making the streets suck for everyone? They suck more for people biking than driving, but there are more drivers than cyclists (even on major on-street bike routes, grumble grumble grumble), so… maybe we come out ahead in the utilitarian pleasure-sabotage calculation? I like cutting off my nose to spite my face as much as the next guy, but this is ridiculous!

        I’m more skeptical than most of the Olmsted legacy, but a big part of the argument here is that this is an Olmsted legacy park. It’s hard to imagine something more Olmsted-ian than admiring the majestic beauty of Lake Washington, dotted with boaters and beachgoers, weekend strollers and tree-lined picnic areas in the foreground. And it’s hard to imagine something less Olmsted-ian than being jolted out of it by thwacking into a damn speed bump.

        Speed bumps aren’t just not-my-first-choice. OK, the first choice is a trail that narrows the roadway. The second choice shouldn’t be a bunch of speed bumps, it should be all that other stuff. Speed bumps should be the last resort. Here they tried nothing and are all out of ideas.

      2. Peter Breyfogle

        Speed cushions are better than speed bumps which are always bad if you go over 15 mph.

    2. Peri Hartman

      Speed bumps really suck, like you said. Absolutely should be forbidden. They really are hard to manage when you have paniers full of groceries or some other heavy load. And they do break cadence, which isn’t needed at 15-20 mph. SDOT: most bikes don’t have shocks. Did you realize that ? !!!

      I’m fine with speed humps or “cushions” though, as Tom says, there are other methods that are better.

      For example, adding more curves and narrowing the lanes would help slow down the traffic and, at the same time, make room for some nice swales and other greenery. Maybe even add some street parking. That slows down traffic, too.

  6. (Another) Tom

    IME speed humps/bumps are effective at slowing most traffic. Even on 15th ave where they aren’t particularly aggressive, I’ve noticed a positive change in the average speed. It only takes one delivery vehicle or cautious driver to slow the pack. As to the bike inconvenience, the obvious solution is to include a narrow cut wide enough for two-wheeled vehicles only.

    1. Gordon

      The speed “cushions” proposed have that cut out (it’s meant for emergency services but it does double duty as a bike cut out) vs the speed humps/bumps that span the entire roadway

  7. Scott

    Speed bumps suck for everyone, I hate them when on my bike, or in my car. Speed cameras would be a better option.

  8. Don Brubeck

    Speed cushions do slow down vehicle speeds for safety. When built to the latest standards and with a split in the middle they let bike riders pass without slowing and they allow fire trucks to straddle the cushions. Reducing vehicle speeds is a key to reducing crashes, deaths and injuries. There are not many other practical and inexpensive ways to do this on typical streets in between intersections. No way that the city could or would install speed cameras in every block, even if state law allowed it.

  9. asdf2

    Walking down the sidewalk, no cars means a quiet walk along the lake. with cars, it’s just too noisy.

    Except for local access, drivers do not need to be using Lake Washington Blvd. They have other routes.

  10. JAT

    For the 45 yrs I’ve been riding on Lake Washington Blvd it’s always been practically perfect as it is. I for one do not want dedicated bicycle space shoehorned in, how many trees will have to come down to accommodate that? Those lane are already pretty narrow as it is. It’s a little paradoxical and counter to the current cycling “community” received wisdom, but I like a wide lane. Motorists can more easily get around me.

    The problem is of course that we all believe (and I’m not saying it’s false, but I don’t know that it’s true) that a wide lane induces a motorist to go too fast. I’m not going to blame the car, which – for the time being at least – is an inanimate object. It’s the motorists – they’re why we can’t have nice things.

  11. Peter Breyfogle

    https://www.change.org/p/fix-the-horrible-road-surface-on-lake-washington-blvd-in-seattle

    This covers the stretch south of 520 down to where Parks and Rec take over and have some projects underway as discussed above.

    It turns out that Seattle DOT does not even have a definition for on road bike routes like this in their list of Bicycle Facilities they build (and hopefully maintain). I am in communication with the MoveSeattleDOT staff person to see if this falling through the cracks (puns intended) can be patched up.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


— Advertisement —

Join the Seattle Bike Blog Supporters

As a supporter, you help power independent bike news in the Seattle area. Please consider supporting the site financially starting at $5 per month:

Latest stories

— Advertisements —

Latest on Mastodon

Loading Mastodon feed…