— Advertisement —
  • The Bicycle Story: Colin Stevens is Seattle’s ‘Bicycling Mad Scientist’

    Wait, is that Sally Bagshaw and Tom Rasmussen pedaling a crazy Stevens-designed pedal-powered parade float? Yes. Yes it is.
    Wait, is that Sally Bagshaw and Tom Rasmussen pedaling a crazy Stevens-designed pedal-powered parade float? Yes. Yes it is.

    Colin Stevens is one part of Cycle Fab, a Georgetown-based machine shop that does all kinds of custom metalworking and bicycle stuff. But he made a name for himself as Haulin’ Colin, designing and building high-capacity bike trailers and workhorse cycle truck kits and bike racks.

    We’ve written about Stevens and his Cycle Fab partner in crime Garth L’Esperance before. But in a recent interview with Josh Cohen at The Bicycle Story, Stevens — dubbed “The Bicycling Mad Scientist of Seattle” — talks a bit more about how he has watched Seattle’s cargo bike culture evolve in the past decade:

    It’s interesting, when my friends and I started out doing that in 2003 or 2004, it was really rare to see any kind of cargo bikes or big bike trailers around. We were the ones doing it. We thought this is a new thing that’s going to become cool and popular in a place like Seattle where people are kind of conscious about the environment and want alternative transportation means. A big city is an ideal place to do it because most of your resources are close by. We thought it was going to be people like us who wanted to transport stuff like lumber or bicycles. What has actually happened is it’s family biking that has made cargo bikes popular. I think the vast majority of cargo bikes now are sold to parents who want to haul their kids around. That has become the driving force, which is pretty cool. I didn’t expect that, but it is great that that’s what’s made it popular.

    Read more…

    Want to see Cycle Fab’s cargo-hauling bikes in action? You’re pretty much guaranteed to see a bunch of them at Cascade Bicycle Club’s bike move November 30.

    — Advertisement —
  • Listen: KUOW on Rainier Ave’s speeding problem + Meeting tonight

    Screenshot from KUOW. Click to listen.
    Screenshot from KUOW. Click to listen.

    Rainier Ave has a serious speeding problem.

    But, of course, that speeding problem is actually a symptom caused by the street’s dangerous, highway-style design problem. Four lanes of traffic splitting through bustling neighborhood centers and business districts is inherently dangerous. In fact, it’s the most dangerous city-owned street in Seattle.

    You can help change that by getting involved with the city’s Rainier Ave Road Safety Corridor Project, which is holding its second community meeting tonight (Tuesday) from 4:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. at the Ethiopian Community Center (8323 Rainier Ave S).

    How dangerous is it? In just the last three years, there have been at least 1,243 collisions between Columbia City and Seward Park, causing 630 injuries and killing two people. KUOW reports that 11 people have died on Rainier in the past decade.

    But you’ve already heard about this from Seattle Bike Blog. But check out this excellent story by KUOW featuring the wonderful Phyllis Porter, who works for Bike Works and helps run Rainier Valley Greenways. It’s only a couple minutes long, but it gets straight to the point:

    “The things that are happening in Rainier Valley, Columbia City, Hillman City,” [Porter] said, naming the neighborhoods off Rainier Avenue, “these things are unacceptable. And something needs to be done now.”

    — Advertisement —
  • Sidewalks should never be ‘closed’ for construction projects

    A familiar scene on Seattle Streets. Image from Google Street View.
    A familiar scene on Seattle Streets. Image from Google Street View.

    Everyone who spends any time walking around Seattle knows what it’s like. You’re walking down the sidewalk when you see the familiar dreaded sign in front of one of the many construction projects around town: Sidewalk Closed.

    You look for the closest crosswalk. Then you peer around the fence. Hmm, do I waste several minutes backtracking, then waiting for the light, then walking a block or two before waiting for another light so I can cross back? Or do I just dash across the street here even though there’s no crosswalk? Or maybe I can just squeeze along this fence in the traffic lane and hope no cars hit me…

    You should never have to make this choice. Instead, any construction project that requires the sidewalk space in order to work should be required to provide a temporary walking route, even if that means closing a parking lane, extra travel lane or — if all other options have been exhausted — bike lane.

    The reasoning is obvious: Basic safety trumps all other road needs. You can put up all the “Sidewalk Closed” signs you want, but it won’t change the fact that many people will try to squeeze by anyway. It’s just a fact of the urban environment.

    City officials seem to agree, yet sidewalks continue to be closed all across the city. Enough is enough. This should never happen. Instead, construction companies should need to temporarily redesign the remaining road space to maintain basic safe access and mobility for all users. The diagram below shows what should be the order of operations for closing lanes in order to accommodate construction on a sample street:

    sample-street-under-construction (more…)

    — Advertisement —
  • Burke-Gilman Trail alerts: New 4-way stop near UW + Trail work near NE 145th St

    UPDATE: Nevermind!

    Image of the intersection before the changes, via Google Street View
    Image of the intersection before the changes, via Google Street View

    After many years of confusion and frustration, the UW has decided to turn the intersection of the Burke-Gilman Trail and Pend Oreille Road into a four-way stop.

    The trail crossing is confusing because while it has a marked crosswalk, trail users have a stop sign while people driving do not. The law requires people biking to stop at the stop sign, but it also requires people driving to yield to trail users. So if someone biking and someone driving arrive at the same time, who is supposed to go first?

    In practice, most people simply treat the intersection as any other crosswalk, which means trail users go first. This means people driving usually stop, and people biking usually roll through the stop sign. This annoys some people who drive, who see it as an example of how “those bicyclists” never follow the rules. But one trip on a bike and you’ll understand why rolling that stop sign makes sense. Because it is a crosswalk, it delays everyone if the person on a bike stops before starting up again to cross first as typical crosswalk laws require.

    Placing a stop sign on the trail breaks the normal order of traffic rules. If traffic rules were a computer program, the trail stop sign would be a bug. But in real life, this means that people largely treat it more as a “caution” sign.

    The danger, of course, is that someone driving will not actually stop, and someone on a bike will get hurt. So the UW is turning the intersection into a four-way stop. This will hopefully address the danger of a collision, which is the most important goal of any road design project.

    Here’s the thinking behind the project, from UW Senior Transportation Planner Elisabeth S. McLaughlin: (more…)

    — Advertisement —
  • Green Lane Project: Here’s why protected bike lanes improve safety for people walking

    Image from Making Safer Streets (NYCDOT), via Green Lane Project
    Image from the Green Lane Project using data from Making Safer Streets (NYCDOT)

    It’s been shown over and over that quality protected bike lanes improve safety for all road users. In fact, protected bike lanes are one of the most effective tools we have to improve safety and comfort for people on foot.

    There are many reasons for this, but the Green Lane Project recently highlighted four of these reasons on their blog, and they used Seattle twice to illustrate their point:

    1. Protected bike lanes shorten crossing distances
    2. Protected bike lanes make it easier to know which direction cars are coming from
    3. Dedicated signal phases prevent turning conflicts with people walking
    4. Protected bike lanes reduce traffic weaving

    To learn more about each point, check out the blog post.

    As Seattle looks to make effective changes to its most dangerous streets, it’s important to realize that protected bike lanes are only partly a tool for helping people get around town on bikes. They are also a way to make a street safer for everyone. That why at times it may make sense for the city to install bike lanes on a street that is not listed on the Bike Master Plan. Like Rainier Avenue.

    Below is a before/after from one Broadway intersection illustrating how the bikeway has dramatically improved comfort and safety for people on foot: (more…)

    — Advertisement —
  • In 1 month Pronto users biked distance from Seattle to NY 8 times + Helmet theft rate down

    tumblr_inline_nezqccrxF41se3we0Pronto Cycle Share is a month old, and I already can’t imagine Seattle without it.

    In just the first month, 1,760 annual members, 1,856 24-hour pass holders and 156 three-day pass holders used the system to make 10,747 trips and travel 22,663 miles on the bike share system. And as Pronto noted in a blog post, that was during the fifth-wettest October ever recorded.

    That means Pronto users have already biked the distance from Seattle to New York. Eight times. It’s also just 2,200 miles shy of a trip around the equator (hey, that’s a good goal for November!).

    That’s pretty impressive considering the average trip is less than 15 minutes.

    So use is pretty strong (though not overwhelming) despite worries that the all ages helmet law in Seattle and King County would sink the bike share system. (more…)

    — Advertisement —
— Advertisement —

Join the Seattle Bike Blog Supporters

As a supporter, you help power independent bike news in the Seattle area. Please consider supporting the site financially starting at $5 per month:

Latest stories

— Advertisements —

Latest on Mastodon

Loading Mastodon feed…